ICEsoft.org Forums: ICEfaces, ICEmobile, ICEpdf

I appreciate the reply. I don't believe it is a "zoom" issue per-se. I am talking about printing on an 8.5"/11" piece of paper. When printed the size of the ovals is exactly the same; it is the width of the strokes that differs. I just took some screen caps from the viewers (above) to give a general idea. Observe the ICEpdf stokes are thinner than Reader even though the ovals are larger.

I'll play with the properties; thanks for that pointer. core.target.stroke looks promising. If you have any specific suggestions that might make the strokes thicker, I'd be grateful.

Ken

Ahh, I missed the attach files button first post. Print with ICDPdf Viewer and Adobe Reader. ~K

patrick.corless wrote:

Can you attach the test file this thread?

Hello. I am finding that very thin lines are drawing "thinner" using ICEPdf than with Adobe Reader. Below are some screencaps to give an idea. I also have a test pattern pdf if there is some place I can put/attach, if that is useful. The lines in question are 3 twips (3/1440th of an inch).

The real problem is that when sent to a printer (a PCL laser printer in my case) the ovals don't render properly -- pixels are missing from the line. Its a bit hard to describe without the paper in your hand. When printing directly from the application (using GDI) it prints okay.

In other words:

app->PCL printer (ok)
app->acrobat 9->reader->PCL printer (ok)
app->acrobat 9->icepdf viewer->PCL printer (missing pixels)

Has anyone seen this before, and is there a way to address?

TIA,
Ken

screen cap from icepdf viewer

screen cap from adobe reader